site stats

Rifkind v superior court

WebSuperior Court, supra, 117 Cal.App.3d 798, nor Rifkind v. Superior Court, supra, 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, was the information sought more than marginally relevant. However, Rifkind and Dompeling both state important principles to apply in considering disclosure of financial information. Dompeling v. WebApr 23, 2024 · However, pursuant to the Court's ruling in Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 7 Cal.App.4th 1257, the complexity and quantity of the existing and potential issues in this case, as 8 well as the expedience of using this method of discovery, make the propounded written 9 interrogatories the most appropriate and least burdensome way for Costco to ...

RIFKIND LAW GROUP

WebApr 11, 2024 · During a hearing where the parties appeared remotely, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Bruce Iwasaki awarded Bezos an additional $371,928.90 in fees but denied a request for $14,614.92 in costs. WebSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0635-20 IN RE NEW JERSEY ... Daniel J. Toal (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac ... Polymers USA, LLC (Theodore V. Wells, Jr., attorney; Kegan A. Brown, of counsel and on the briefs; Thomas Pearce and Taylor West, on the briefs). … great scott it worked https://leishenglaser.com

Rifkind & Sterling, Inc. v. Rifkind (1994) :: :: California Court of ...

WebJul 22, 1993 · The Valley Bank analysis was applied to a marriage dissolution proceeding in Rifkind v. Superior Court (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, 177 Cal.Rptr. 82. There, the husband was the president of an incorporated law firm of 28 lawyers, 14 of whom were shareholders. WebSep 28, 1994 · Rifkind relies almost exclusively on applications of the federal due process clause, and he advances no reason why disposition of his federally-based claim should not control the parallel state constitutional issue. (Cf. Garfinkle v. Superior Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 268, 282, 146 Cal.Rptr. 208, 578 P.2d 925 [Garfinkle ].) Web(Rifkind v. Superior Court (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, 177 Cal.Rptr. These documents were unquestionably relevant. The declaration of William L. Mills, a certified public accountant and expert f...... Request a trial to view additional results 6 cases Schnabel v. Superior Court, No. S024822 United States great scott landscaping bedford nh

Deposition hell and what to do about it - Plaintiff Magazine

Category:Rifkind v. Superior Court (Rifkind) (1981) - Justia Law

Tags:Rifkind v superior court

Rifkind v superior court

Rifkind v. Superior Court California Court of Appeal 02-23-1994 ...

WebFeb 23, 1994 · (See Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1260, 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 13 Respondent's proposed undisputed fact number 10 stated at the time … WebDefendant Robert Gore Rifkind (Rifkind) appeals from a judgment confirming a $141,826 contractual arbitration award to plaintiff Rifkind & Sterling, Incorporated (R&S), including attorney fees of $30,957 and punitive damages of $25,000.

Rifkind v superior court

Did you know?

WebJul 28, 2024 · In Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, the deponent was instructed not to answer various “contention” questions. In response, the deposing party brought a motion to compel, which the court … WebOct 9, 2024 · (Rifkind v. Superior Court, 22 Cal. App. 4th 1255, 1262-64 (1994); Villa v. McFerren (1995) 35 Cal. App. 4th 733, 748-49 (a party’s responses to deposition questions on topics for which the party would not be expected to have personal, percipient knowledge cannot be used to shift the burden on an absence of evidence theory in a summary ...

WebROBERT GORE RIFKIND, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; NED GOOD, Real Party in Interest. No. B075946. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, ... contention questions at a deposition is Pember v. Superior Court (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 888 [50 Cal.Rptr. Page 3 WebRifkind v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, 177 Cal.Rptr. 82 (1981); see Wells v. Wells, 108 Misc.2d 501, 437 N.Y.S.2d 622 (1981); Borg v. Borg, 32 …

WebMar 12, 2024 · Superior Court, 54 Cal.2d 318 (1960); Rifkind v. Superior Court, 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 (1960). Tellingly, the Legislature could have used the exact same language with respect to document demands under section 2031.010, et seq. But, in drafting section 2031, the Legislature chose not to include any reference to the use of “contention” style ... WebJan 2, 2024 · You are commanded to appear at the offices of paul, weiss, rifkind, wharton & garrison llp at 1285 avenue of the americas, new york, ny 10019 at 9:30 a.m. ...

WebThe Rifkind laundry list. This is a good place to interpose a Rifkind objection also. Rifkind v. Sup. Ct. (Good) (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1259, stands for the proposition that it is improper to ask your client for legal contentions and the evidence supporting legal theories such as causation, damages, apportionment of fault. That is what ...

WebMar 23, 2024 · Rifkind v. Superior Court 2 Analysesof this case by attorneys How to Defend Your Client in a Deposition StenoMarch 23, 2024 Types of Objections in DepositionsYou … great scott lotionWebFeb 22, 1994 · Mr. Rifkind is not a litigator, and his answer apparently was patterned after that of a co-defendant and former partner. Mr. Rifkind's present attorneys were … great scott maintenanceWebquestion implicates Rifkind, a privilege, work product, or privacy. (Stewart v. Colonial Western Agency, Inc. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 1006, 1015; Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1259.) was seeking discovery of a 28-page report. The Rifkind court found that it is improper to ask a party to state its legal great scott market winchester ilWebRobert Gore RIFKIND, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent, Gogi Grant RIFKIND, Real Party in Interest. Civ. 62273. Decided: September … great scott lineWebRifkind v. Superior Court (Good) (1994) Annotate this Case [No. B075946. Second Dist., Div. Four. Feb 23, 1994.] ROBERT GORE RIFKIND, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS … great scott martyWebApr 11, 2024 · The fight between Bernard and Rokita started when The Indianapolis Star published a story July 1, 2024, examining the impact of abortion bans in neighboring states following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 124 S. Ct., 2228 (2024). Included in the article was a reference to an abortion Bernard ... great scott marty quoteWebRIFKIND v. SUPERIOR COURT Important Paras The superior court's orders embrace a great deal of material which Husband has produced or has agreed to produce. The financial … great scott meats buhl mn