WebJan 1, 2024 · AMD FX-8350 Test in 7 Games (2024) 40,671 views. Jan 1, 2024. WebFeb 7, 2024 · Depends. For gaming, yes. For what you're doing, probably not. It depends what applications you run. If it's heavy video editing software that can utilize the extra cores of the FX-8350, then it'll be fine. If it only uses a few, then it will be bottlenecking. You may want to think about using a Quadro card and perhaps a GeForce card for the ...
RX Vega 64 benchmark with FX-8320 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K ...
WebWhen the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance. 4. Has an unlocked multiplier. AMD A8-7680. AMD FX-8350. Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps. WebThe FX was priced nowhere near the 2600K, and the argument was it's 8 cores will age well, relative to the 4 core of the more expensive 2500K. Though I didn't buy this argument cos the gap was something like 40% per core, so even if the FX was fully utilized, it wouldn't edge out ahead. Hence it was cheaper. fthyd
Is AMD FX 8350 good for video editing and ... - Tom
WebMay 8, 2013 · It has four cores instead of eight, but its base clock speed of 3.8GHz is only slightly lower than the 4GHz stock speed of the company's top-end FX chip, the FX-8350. If you're looking to... WebThe FX 6300 was 10% cheaper than the 3570k. The FX 8350 was 33% cheaper; literally $100 cheaper than the 3770k. That's MSRP prices, before the discounts; and the FX series always had some discount going. AMD motherboards were usually cheaper too. There were plenty of very cost-effective gaming PCs built with AMD FX CPUs. WebRX Vega 64 benchmark with FX-8320 at Ultra Quality settings in 68 games and fps benchmarks in 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Find out the RX Vega 64 equivalent, with a review of specifications, price, RX Vega 64 framerate comparison, RX … fthxh